CementGrindingAidTechnical enquiry

Grade-specific supporting guide · Reviewed 9 October 2026

IN-5 mill trial checklist

Resolve the IN-5 document questions, then prepare a comparable mill record for a technically supervised evaluation.

Confirm that the instructions belong to IN-5

The IN-5 product page identifies the supplied brown liquid compound grinding aid. The original document also contains a process section labelled TGA-5 and differing cement designations. These are unresolved applicability questions, not permission to transfer that section to IN-5.

Before operational use, obtain a current IN-5-specific TDS and SDS, confirmation of intended cement types and written clarification of the conflicting references. This page does not supply dilution, temperature, commissioning or safe-handling instructions.

Define the decision and evidence needed

Choose a primary trial question: a change in output at comparable quality, a change in specific energy at comparable output and quality, or a cement performance target. Keep the quality limits explicit. The General mill protocol owns the broader trial method; this supporting page adds the IN-5 identity and evidence checks.

IN-5 pre-trial information
RecordWhat to confirm
Grade and batchIN-5 identification, supplier, current revision, sample or delivery batch and available COA. Ask which reported properties are batch-tested.
Dose confirmationThe supplied reference is 0.05% on cement mass, with 0.04–0.06% also mentioned. Confirm applicability and supplied-liquid basis with the supplier; the range is not an optimized setting for your mill.
Cement and circuitCement designation and composition, clinker and addition sources, mill type, circuit configuration and the responsible technical team.
Goal and acceptance criteriaDefine the output or energy question, fineness and quality targets, sampling plan and review responsibility before comparing results.

Do not infer that IN-5 is neat TEA, TIPA or DEIPA, or that a generic chemical-family description supplies its formulation.

Build a baseline that can be compared

Baseline and candidate record
RecordWhat to confirm
Feed and operating conditionsRecord cement composition, material batches and relevant operating conditions over matched reporting windows. Log changes rather than treating them as unchanged.
Output and energy boundaryRecord actual cement output, metered energy and the equipment included in the boundary. Use compatible time windows and state the basis for kWh/t.
QualityRecord fineness and relevant particle-size, setting and strength results using the plant’s agreed methods and ages. Retain sample IDs and test conditions.
Additive deliveryRecord the confirmed product basis and actual product mass consumed against cement output. Retain the dosing system’s applicable verification record; nominal settings alone do not establish delivered mass.

If feed composition, separator settings or quality targets change at the same time as the additive, report those changes. Do not label the entire difference an IN-5 effect. The Troubleshooting centre helps organize observations that need investigation.

Review the data in stages

  1. Check model and document applicability before treating a dose or process note as usable.
  2. Compare matched baseline and candidate windows and identify process deviations.
  3. Associate the corresponding cement samples with their laboratory results.
  4. Review quality alongside output and energy; a larger output number alone is not acceptance.
  5. Record repeat-evaluation needs and the responsible team’s decision before commercial scale-up.

Chryso’s published limestone-cement case identifies the mill circuit, cement changes, samples and performance review. It is an example of trial documentation, not evidence of an IN-5 result. Documented mill case.

Keep a technical result separate from an ROI estimate

Use actual delivered product mass and the offered price to estimate chemical cost. State whether an energy comparison uses the same quality target and system boundary. Any output benefit needs a defined commercial assumption; do not count it automatically as realized revenue.

ROI calculator can organize scenario arithmetic after the trial assumptions are established. IN-5 purchase planning converts a confirmed dose and production schedule into quantities.

GCP’s HEA2 page discusses product-specific dosing equipment and evaluation support, and restricts its information to Thailand. Its dose and dilution instructions do not apply to IN-5. External-grade reference.

Send the IN-5 evaluation brief

Include cement designation and composition, mill system, production and energy baseline, quality targets, sampling capability, proposed evaluation window and the document conflicts you need clarified. Request the current IN-5 specification, SDS and sample traceability.

Request documents · Discuss a trial

No IN-5 plant trial, energy saving, strength uplift or compliance approval is verified by this checklist. Site-specific procedures remain with the responsible technical and safety teams.